R. C. LAHOTI, G. P. MATHUR, TARUN CHATTERJEE
MEENAKSHI – Appellant
Versus
MUKESH KUMAR – Respondent
ORDER
1. THE LEARNED COUNSEL FOR THE PETITIONER STATES THAT THE PETITIONER IS THREATENED WHILE PARTICIPATING IN THE PROCEEDINGS IN THE COURT AT GURGAON AND FURTHER THERE IS INCONVENIENCE INVOLVED IN TRAVELLING FROM HER PLACE OF RESIDENCE TO THE PLACE WHERE THE COURT IS SITUATED.
2. LEARNED COUNSEL FOR THE RESPONDENT STATES, UNDER INSTRUCTIONS, THAT NO INCONVENIENCE SHALL BE CAUSED TO THE PETITIONER AND FULL CARE SHALL BE TAKEN OF THE SAFETY AND SECURITY OF THE PETITIONER WHICH SHALL NOT BE JEOPARDISED IN ANY A MANNER WHATSOEVER. OVER AND ABOVE, THE RESPONDENT SHALL PAY IN ADVANCE BEFORE EVERY NEXT DATE OF HEARING THE CONVEYANCE CHARGES INCURRED BY THE PETITIONER IN TRAVELLING BY TAXI FOR ATTENDING THE COURT PROCEEDINGS AT GURGAON.
3. IN VIEW OF THAT STATEMENT MADE ON BEHALF OF THE RESPONDENT, THE TRANSFER PETITION IS DISMISSED.
4. LET A COPY OF THIS ORDER BE COMMUNICATED TO THE TRIAL COURT.
5. INTERIM ORDER DATED 21-11-2003 STAYING FURTHER PROCEEDINGS IN THE TRIAL COURT STANDS VACATED.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.