SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(SC) 1325

P.VENKATARAMA REDDI, TARUN CHATTERJEE
KAMAL – Appellant
Versus
State Of Haryana – Respondent


ORDER

1. LEAVE GRANTED.

2. THIS IS A CASE IN WHICH THE APPELLANT HAS BEEN CONVICTED UNDER SECTION 304-B IPC AND SENTENCED TO IMPRISONMENT FOR 7 YEARS. IT APPEARS THAT SO FAR THE APPELLANT HAS UNDERGONE IMPRISONMENT FOR ABOUT 2 YEARS AND FOUR MONTHS. THE HIGH COURT DECLINED TO GRANT BAIL PENDING DISPOSAL OF THE APPEAL BEFORE IT. WE ARE OF THE VIEW THAT THE BAIL SHOULD HAVE BEEN GRANTED BY THE HIGH COURT, ESPECIALLY HAVING REGARD TO THE FACT THAT THE APPELLANT HAS ALREADY SERVED A SUBSTANTIAL PERIOD OF THE SENTENCE. IN THE CIRCUMSTANCES, WE DIRECT THAT BAIL BE GRANTED TO THE APPELLANT ON SUCH CONDITIONS AS MAY BE IMPOSED BY THE DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, FARIDABAD.

3. THE APPEAL IS DISPOSED OF ACCORDINGLY.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top