P. P. NAOLEKAR, R. C. LAHOTI, G. P. MATHUR
JAYANTA SAMAL – Appellant
Versus
KULAMANI BEHERA – Respondent
ORDER
1. LEAVE GRANTED.
2. ELECTIONS TO THE OFFICE OF SARPANCH OF KENDUAPADA PANCHAYAT IN THE STATE OF ORISSA WERE HELD ON 23-2-2002 UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF THE ORISSA GRAMA PANCHAYAT ACT. THE RESULT WAS DECLARED ON 28-2-2002. THE APPELLANT SECURED 1578 VOTES WHILE RESPONDENT 1 SECURED 1644 VOTES. ACCORDINGLY, RESPONDENT 1 WAS DECLARED ELECTED.
3. THE APPELLANT FILED AN ELECTION PETITION LAYING CHALLENGE TO THE ELECTION OF THE RESPONDENT AND SEEKING A DECLARATION THAT THE ELECTION OF THE RESPONDENT BE DECLARED NULL AND VOID AND THE APPELLANT BE DECLARED TO HAVE BEEN ELECTED. ONE OF THE PRAYERS MADE IN THE ELECTION PETITION WAS SEEKING RECOUNT OF THE VOTES CAST AT THE ELECTION. IT WAS ALLEGED IN THE ELECTION PETITION, INTER ALIA:
"8. THAT AT THE TIME OF COUNTING THE SUPPORTERS OF OP 1 AT THE INSTANCE OF OP 1 OVERPOWERED POLLING STAFF INCLUDING PRESIDING OFFICER IN ALL THE BOOTHS, DOMINATED ENTIRE SCENARIO OF COUNTING AND MOBILISED THE PRESIDING AND POLLING OFFICERS TO PLAY INTO THEIR HANDS, WHIMS AND CAPRICES. ABOUT TWO HUNDRED VOTES WHICH WOULD HAVE BEEN REJECTED WERE COUNTED IN FAVOUR OF OP 1 AND ABOUT TWO HUNDRED VOTES WHICH WOULD HAVE BEEN COUNTED IN FAVOUR OF THE PETITIONER W
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.