SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(SC) 812

K.G.BALAKRISHNAN, A.R.LAKSHMANAN
SUMAN RAKHEJA – Appellant
Versus
State Of Haryana – Respondent


ORDER

1. LEAVE GRANTED.

2. HEARD COUNSEL FOR THE APPELLANT AS WELL AS THE COUNSEL FOR THE RESPONDENTS.

3. THE APPELLANT IS THE WIFE OF A DECEASED GOVERNMENT SERVANT WHO HAD UNDERGONE TREATMENT IN THE APOLLO HOSPITAL, NEW DELHI, WHICH WAS A PRIVATE HOSPITAL AND WHICH WAS NOT RECOGNISED/APPROVED AT THAT TIME. FOR THE TREATMENT IN THAT HOSPITAL THE APPELLANT INCURRED EXPENSES TO THE TUNE OF RS 6,01,166 AND THE APPELLANT, BY WAY OF AN APPLICATION PRAYED FOR REIMBURSEMENT OF THE MEDICAL EXPENSES INCURRED, BUT THE SAME WAS DECLINED BY THE STATE, ON THE GROUND THAT THE HOSPITAL WHEREIN THE APPELLANTS HUSBAND HAD UNDERGONE THE TREATMENT WAS NOT AN APPROVED HOSPITAL.

4. COUNSEL FOR THE APPELLANT SUBMITTED THAT IN SIMILAR CASE (ANNEXURE P-4) I.E. BY THE ORDER OF THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA IN SANT PRAKASH V. STATE OF HARYANA1 WHEREIN IN AN EMERGENCY CASE THE PATIENT HAD TO BE IMMEDIATELY ADMITTED IN HOSPITAL, THE RELIEF HAS BEEN GRANTED. IN THE PRESENT CASE ALSO THE APPELLANTS HUSBAND HAD TO BE RUSHED TO THE PRIVATE HOSPITAL BECAUSE HE HAD DEVELOPED A PARALYTIC STROKE ON THE LEFT SIDE OF THE BODY, AS THERE WAS BLOOD CLOTTING ON THE RIGHT SIDE OF THE BRAIN AND THEREFORE, G WAS ADMIT


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top