SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(SC) 541

RUMA PAL, B.N.SRIKRISHNA
DIRECTOR, NAVODAYA VIDYALAYA SAMITIS – Appellant
Versus
BABBAN PRASAD YADAV – Respondent


ORDER

1. LEAVE GRANTED.

2. APPELLANT 1 IS AN EDUCATIONAL ORGANISATION AND HAS BEEN REGISTERED AS A SOCIETY UNDER THE SOCIETIES REGISTRATION ACT. RESPONDENT 1 (REFERRED TO HEREAFTER AS "THE RESPONDENT") WAS EMPLOYED AS A TEACHER BY THE SOCIETY. ON 8-2-2001 THE SERVICES OF THE RESPONDENT WERE TERMINATED. THE ORDER OF TERMINATION RECORDS THAT THE RESPONDENT WAS PRIMA FACIE FOUND GUILTY OF MORAL TURPITUDE BECAUSE HE HAD INDULGED IN IMMORAL CONDUCT WITH ONE OF THE STUDENTS OF THE SCHOOL BY WRITING UNDESIRABLE LETTERS/REMARKS TO HER. IT IS FURTHER RECORDED THAT THE DIRECTOR WHILE ISSUING THE ORDER OF TERMINATION, WAS SATISFIED THAT THE PROCEDURE OF HOLDING A REGULAR DEPARTMENTAL ENQUIRY UNDER THE CENTRAL CIVIL SERVICES (CLASSIFICATION, CONTROL AND APPEAL) RULES, 1965 WAS NOT EXPEDIENT, AS THE SAME MAY CAUSE SERIOUS EMBARRASSMENT TO THE GIRL STUDENT AND HER PARENTS. A FULL ENQUIRY WAS THEREFORE DISPENSED WITH. FINALLY, THE ORDER STATED THAT THE EVIDENCE ON RECORD ESTABLISHED THE RESPONDENTS GUILT AND THAT HIS CONTINUATION IN A RESIDENTIAL INSTITUTION, LIKE THE APPELLANT SOCIETY, WOULD BE PREJUDICIAL TO THE INTEREST OF THE GIRL STUDENTS AND THE INSTITUTION ITSELF. THE RESPONDENT WAS GIVEN





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top