RUMA PAL, B.N.SRIKRISHNA
DIRECTOR, NAVODAYA VIDYALAYA SAMITIS – Appellant
Versus
BABBAN PRASAD YADAV – Respondent
ORDER
1. LEAVE GRANTED.
2. APPELLANT 1 IS AN EDUCATIONAL ORGANISATION AND HAS BEEN REGISTERED AS A SOCIETY UNDER THE SOCIETIES REGISTRATION ACT. RESPONDENT 1 (REFERRED TO HEREAFTER AS "THE RESPONDENT") WAS EMPLOYED AS A TEACHER BY THE SOCIETY. ON 8-2-2001 THE SERVICES OF THE RESPONDENT WERE TERMINATED. THE ORDER OF TERMINATION RECORDS THAT THE RESPONDENT WAS PRIMA FACIE FOUND GUILTY OF MORAL TURPITUDE BECAUSE HE HAD INDULGED IN IMMORAL CONDUCT WITH ONE OF THE STUDENTS OF THE SCHOOL BY WRITING UNDESIRABLE LETTERS/REMARKS TO HER. IT IS FURTHER RECORDED THAT THE DIRECTOR WHILE ISSUING THE ORDER OF TERMINATION, WAS SATISFIED THAT THE PROCEDURE OF HOLDING A REGULAR DEPARTMENTAL ENQUIRY UNDER THE CENTRAL CIVIL SERVICES (CLASSIFICATION, CONTROL AND APPEAL) RULES, 1965 WAS NOT EXPEDIENT, AS THE SAME MAY CAUSE SERIOUS EMBARRASSMENT TO THE GIRL STUDENT AND HER PARENTS. A FULL ENQUIRY WAS THEREFORE DISPENSED WITH. FINALLY, THE ORDER STATED THAT THE EVIDENCE ON RECORD ESTABLISHED THE RESPONDENTS GUILT AND THAT HIS CONTINUATION IN A RESIDENTIAL INSTITUTION, LIKE THE APPELLANT SOCIETY, WOULD BE PREJUDICIAL TO THE INTEREST OF THE GIRL STUDENTS AND THE INSTITUTION ITSELF. THE RESPONDENT WAS GIVEN
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.