SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(SC) 280

P.VENKATARAMA REDDI, K.G.BALAKRISHNAN
CBI, NEW DELHI – Appellant
Versus
MOHINDER SINGH – Respondent


ORDER

1. LEAVE GRANTED.

2. HEARD LEARNED COUNSEL FOR BOTH THE PARTIES. CM, SPECIAL INVESTIGATION CELL, HAS FILED THIS APPEAL CHALLENGING THE ORDER PASSED BY THE LEARNED SINGLE JUDGE OF THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAH AND HARYANA. THE RESPONDENT HEREIN HAD FILED A COMPLAINT BEFORE THE POLICE ALLEGING THAT HIS SON DIDAR SINGH HAD BEEN KILLED IN A FALSE ENCOUNTER. A CASE WAS REGISTERED BY CBI. IT CONDUCTED INVESTIGATION AND FILED THE FINAL REPORT BEFORE THE COURT ALLEGING THAT THE SAID DIDAR SINGH ESCAPED FROM POLICE CUSTODY AND WAS NOT KILLED IN ANY ENCOUNTER. THE RESPONDENT, THEREAFTER, FILED AN APPLICATION BEFORE THE SPECIAL JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, CBI PRAYING THAT THE RESPONDENT SHALL BE SUPPLIED WITH THE ENTIRE DOCUMENTARY AS WELL AS ORAL TESTIMONY OF THE WITNESSES COLLECTED DURING THE INVESTIGATION FOR THE PURPOSE OF PURSUING THE MATTER. THIS APPLICATION WAS ALLOWED BY THE SPECIAL JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE. AGGRIEVED BY THE SAME, CM FILED A REVISION PETITION BEFORE THE HIGH COURT. THE LEARNED SINGLE JUDGE BY THE IMPUGNED ORDER DIRECTED THAT THE PROSECUTION SHALL SUPPLY THE ENTIRE SET OF DOCUMENTS WHICH ACCOMPANIED THE REPORT UNDER SECTION 173 CR. PC. IT IS ALSO OBSERVED THAT AS REGARDS THE CASE

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top