SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(SC) 996

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
S.N. VARIAVA, H.K. SEMA, JJ.
PUNJAB STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD AND ANOTHER -APPELLANTS
VERSUS
RAJ & SANDEEP LTD. - RESPONDENT
CIVIL APPEAL NO. 1867 OF 1998,
DECIDED ON OCTOBER 8, 2003

The main legal point established in the judgment is the interpretation of the contract between the parties regarding the payment of interest on the unadjusted amount deposited under the accelerated release of power connection scheme.

Headnote:

INTEREST - POWER CONNECTION - The court held that the appellants were bound to continue to pay interest on the unadjusted amount, but as per the contract, they were only liable to pay simple interest at 7% from the due date till the date of adjustment. The court set aside the previous orders and directed the appellants to pay simple interest at 7% from the due date till the date of adjustment.

Fact of the Case:

The appellants had a scheme for accelerated release of power connection where a consumer could deposit at a higher rate and receive simple interest. The respondent deposited a sum under this scheme, and after the expiration of the specified period, the amount was not adjusted, leading to a complaint by the respondent.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the appellants were bound to continue to pay interest on the unadjusted amount, but as per the contract, they were only liable to pay simple interest at 7% from the due date till the date of adjustment. The court set aside the previous orders and directed the appellants to pay simple interest at 7% from the due date till the date of adjustment.

Issues: The main issue was the calculation of interest on the unadjusted amount deposited by the respondent under the accelerated release of power connection scheme.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the appellants were bound to continue to pay interest on the unadjusted amount, but as per the contract, they were only liable to pay simple interest at 7% from the due date till the date of adjustment. The court set aside the previous orders and directed the appellants to pay simple interest at 7% from the due date till the date of adjustment.

Final Decision: The court directed the appellants to pay simple interest at 7% from the due date till the date of adjustment and disposed of the appeal accordingly.

ORDER

1. THIS APPEAL IS FILED AGAINST THE ORDER OF THE NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION DATED 3-4-2001.

2. BRIEFLY STATED, THE FACTS ARE AS FOLLOWS:

THE APPELLANTS HAD FLOATED A SCHEME KNOWN AS ACCELERATED RELEASE OF POWER CONNECTION (ARPC). UNDER THE SCHEME INSTEAD OF DEPOSITING AT THE NORMAL RATE OF RS 400 PER KW, A CONSUMER COULD DEPOSIT AT THE RATE OF RS 750 PER KW. ON THAT AMOUNT SIMPLE INTEREST @ 7% P.A. WAS TO BE PAID. THE SCHEME PROVIDED THAT AFTER A PERIOD OF FIVE YEARS, FROM THE DATE OF DEPOSIT, THE AMOUNT DEPOSITED ALONG WITH INTEREST THEREON WOULD BE ADJUSTED AGAINST DUES OF FUTURE BILLS. IF THERE WAS A DISCONNECTION THEN THE DEPOSITED AMOUNT AND INTEREST WERE TO BE REFUNDED.

3. PURSUANT TO THE SAID SCHEME, THE RESPONDENT DEPOSITED RS 7,50,000 ON 24-3-1987. THE FIVE YEARS EXPIRED ON 24-3-1992. IT SEEMS THAT THE AMOUNT OF RS 7,50,000 WAS ONLY ADJUSTED BY THE APPELLANTS ON 2-4-1993. THE INTEREST AMOUNT THEREON WAS ADJUSTED ON 18-6-1993.

4. THE RESPONDENT FILED A COMPLAINT BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER FORUM CLAIMING THAT FOR THE PERIOD, AFTER THE END OF FIVE YEARS, DURING WHICH THE AMOUNT HAD NOT BEEN ADJUSTED, HE WAS ENTITLED TO INTEREST @ 22%. HE ALSO CLAIMED INTEREST ON INTEREST. THE DISTRICT CONSUMER FORUM ALLOWED THE CLAIM BY GRANTING INTEREST @ 18% NOT JUST ON THE PRINCIPAL SUM OF RS 7,50,000 BUT ALSO ON THE INTEREST AMOUNT OF RS 2,62,500. THE APPEAL FILED BEFORE THE STATE CONSUMER FORUM WAS DISMISSED. THE REVISION BEFORE THE NATIONAL CONSUMER FORUM HAS ALSO BEEN DISMISSED BY THE IMPUGNED ORDER.

5. IN OUR VIEW, SO LONG AS THE AMOUNT REMAINED UNADJUSTED THE APPELLANTS WERE BOUND TO CONTINUE TO PAY INTEREST. HOWEVER, THE CONTRACT BETWEEN THE PARTIES PROVIDES THAT SIMPLE INTEREST WILL BE PAID @ 7%. THEREFORE, ALL THAT THE APPELLANTS BECOME LIABLE TO PAY IS SIMPLE INTEREST @ 7% FROM 24-3-1992 TILL THE DATE WHEN THE PRINCIPAL SUM WAS ADJUSTED ON 2-4-1993. THERE CAN BE NO QUESTION OF PAYMENT OF INTEREST ON INTEREST.

6. THUS, WE SET ASIDE THE ORDERS AND DIRECTIONS OF THE CONSUMER FORUMS AND DIRECT THAT THE APPELLANTS SHALL PAY SIMPLE INTEREST @ 7% FROM 24-3-1992 TILL THE DATE OF ADJUSTMENT I.E. 2-4-1993.

7. THE APPEAL STANDS DISPOSED OF ACCORDINGLY. NO ORDER AS TO COSTS.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top