SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(SC) 1372

S.N.VARIAVA, H.K.SEMA
ANURADHA DUTRA – Appellant
Versus
SUBASH CHANDRA DUTRA – Respondent


ORDER

1. WE HAD HEARD THE PARTIES ON 4-10-2004. ON THAT DATE WE WERE INCLINED TO ACCEPT THE RESPONDENTS OFFER TO PAY FOR TRAVEL AND STAY EXPENSES, NOT ONLY OF THE PETITIONER BUT ALSO OF THE PERSON TO ACCOMPANY HER. AT THAT STAGE, TIME WAS TAKEN TO ENABLE THE PARTIES TO SETTLE THE MATTER. WE ARE NOW INFORMED THAT THE MATTER CANNOT BE SETTLED.

2. IN OUR VIEW NO SUFFICIENT GROUND HAS BEEN MADE OUT FOR TRANSFER. WHEN THE RESPONDENT IS WILLING TO PAY FOR TRAVEL AND STAY EXPENSES NOT ONLY OF THE PETITIONER BUT ALSO OF A PERSON TO ACCOMPANY HER THERE WILL BE NO DIFFICULTY FOR THE PETITIONER TO ATTEND THE PROCEEDINGS IN SILIGURI. THE TRIAL COURT SHALL ENSURE THAT THE RESPONDENT PAYS TO THE PETITIONER ON EACH OCCASION SHE TRAVELS TO SILIGURI, THE TRAVEL AND STAY EXPENSES OF THE PETITIONER AND THE PERSON WHO ACCOMPANIES HER.

3. WITH THE ABOVE DIRECTION THE TRANSFER PETITION IS DISMISSED.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top