SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(SC) 1010

RUMA PAL, ARUN KUMAR
HEM KANT JHA – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent


ORDER

1. LEAVE GRANTED.

2. THESE SPECIAL LEAVE PETITIONS HAVE BEEN FILED BY PERSONS WHO HAD BEEN EMPLOYED IN THE POLICE DEPARTMENT IN THE STATE OF BIHAR AS CONSTABLES. THEIR SERVICES WERE TERMINATED BY A SERIES OF ORDERS. THESE ORDERS OF TERMINATION WERE CHALLENGED BY SEVERAL WRIT PETITIONS. SOME OF THE WRIT PETITIONS WERE HEARD AND DISPOSED OF BY A LEARNED JUDGE WHO IS ALSO A PARTY TO THE DECISION ON THE APPEAL PREFERRED BY THE APPELLANTS FROM HIS DECISION. THIS IS ENTIRELY UNACCEPTABLE. IT GOES WITHOUT SAYING THAT A JUDGE WHO HEARS AND DECIDES A MATTER WHILE SITTING SINGLY SHOULD NOT PARTICIPATE IN ANY MANNER WHATSOEVER IN THE APPEAL FROM HIS ORDER. THE DECISION OF THE DIVISION BENCH IS SET ASIDE ON THIS GROUND ALONE AND THE MATTER IS REMANDED BACK TO THE HIGH COURT FOR BEING HEARD AND DISPOSED OF BY A BENCH OF JUDGES WHO HAD NOT DEALT WITH THESE WRIT PETITIONS SITTING SINGLY. THE HIGH COURT IS REQUESTED TO DISPOSE OF THE APPEALS AS EXPEDITIOUSLY AS IS CONVENIENTLY POSSIBLE.

3. THE APPEALS ARE DISPOSED OF ACCORDINGLY.

4. THE IAS ARE TREATED AS INFRUCTUOUS AND NO ORDERS ARE PASSED THEREON.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top