B.N.AGARWAL, Y.K.SABHARWAL
JAMIL AHMED – Appellant
Versus
INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT COMMISSIONER & PRINCIPAL SECRETARYS – Respondent
ORDER
1. LEAVE GRANTED.
2. THE APPELLANT WAS A SENIOR INSPECTOR IN RAILWAY PROTECTION SPECIAL FORCE (RPSF). HE HAD WORKED ON DEPUTATION WITH NEW OKHLA INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (HEREINAFTER REFERRED TO AS "THE AUTHORITY") FROM 4-6-1992 TO 5-1-1993. THE CHAIRMAN AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF THE AUTHORITY BY COMMUNICATION DATED 26-2-1993 ADDRESSED TO THE INSPECTOR GENERAL OF RPSF STATED THAT THE SERVICES OF THE APPELLANT ON DEPUTATION DURING THE AFORESAID PERIOD WERE FOUND TO BE EXCEPTIONALLY GOOD. IT WAS ALSO STATED IN THE SAID COMMUNICATION THAT THE ASSOCIATION OF THE APPELLANT WITH EXPORT PROCESSING ZONE OF THE AUTHORITY FOR OVER FOUR YEARS DEALING WITH GENERAL ADMINISTRATION AND PERSONNEL MATTERS, LAW AND ORDER, SECURITY, EXCISE AND CUSTOM AND OTHER RELATED ISSUES LED TO HIS DEVELOPMENT AS A WELL BALANCED OFFICER AND THAT HE HELD CHARGE OF SECURITY OFFICER, ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER AND ESTATE MANAGER IN THE SAID EXPORT ZONE. THE AUTHORITY, UNDER THE AFORESAID CIRCUMSTANCES, PROPOSED RPSF THE PERMANENT ABSORPTION OF THE APPELLANT IN THE AUTHORITY EXPRESSING ITS WILLINGNESS TO PROTECT HIS PAY AND OTHER PERKS IN THE PARENT DEPARTMENT. IN TERMS OF LETTER DATED 18-3-1993, THE A
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.