G.B.PATTANAIK, K.G.BALAKRISHNAN
SIVASURIYAN – Appellant
Versus
THANGAVELU – Respondent
ORDER
1. LEAVE GRANTED.
2. THE ACCUSED IS IN APPEAL AGAINST THE IMPUGNED ORDER OF THE HIGH COURT IN EXERCISING REVISIONAL POWER AT THE BEHEST OF THE COMPLAINANT. ON THE BASIS OF A COMPLAINT FILED UNDER SECTION 138 READ WITH SECTION 142 OF THE NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS ACT, THE MAGISTRATE TOOK COGNIZANCE, ISSUED PROCESS AND FINALLY DISPOSED OF THE MATTER HOLDING THE ACCUSED GUILTY AND CONVICTING HIM THEREUNDER. FOR SUCH CONVICTION, THE MAGISTRATE SENTENCED HIM TO UNDERGO SIX MONTHS RIGOROUS IMPRISONMENT AND A FINE OF RS 5000. AGAINST THE AFORESAID CONVICTION AND SENTENCE, THE ACCUSED MOVED IN APPEAL AND THE LEARNED ADDITIONAL SESSIONS JUDGE UPHELD THE CONVICTION, BUT MODIFIED THE SENTENCE. THE ADDITIONAL SESSIONS JUDGE DIRECTED THAT THE SENTENCE SHOULD BE TILL RISING OF COURT, BUT THE FINE AMOUNT ALREADY DIRECTED WAS AFFIRMED. AGAINST THIS ORDER OF THE ADDITIONAL SESSIONS JUDGE, THE COMPLAINANT MOVED IN REVISION. THE HIGH COURT IN EXERCISE OF ITS REVISIONAL JURISDICTION, IN PARAGRAPH 7 OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT WHILE AFFIRMING THE SENTENCE IMPOSED BY THE APPELLATE COURT, FURTHER DIRECTED THAT THE ACCUSED SHOULD PAY A COMPENSATION OF RS ONE LAKH UNDER SECTION 357 OF THE CODE OF CRIMINAL
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.