B.N.SRIKRISHNA, R.V.RAVEENDRAN
K. P. Sudhakaran – Appellant
Versus
State Of Kerala – Respondent
Understood. I am ready to analyze the legal document provided within the
Please provide the content of the legal document. Once received, I will extract the key points and format the output exactly as requested: 1. List each key point clearly. 2. Append the specific page reference (e.g., (!) ) to the end of each point. 3. Ensure references are listed separately for each point (e.g., (!) (!) ) rather than combined.
I am standing by for the document content.
Judgment
Raveendran, J. — These appeals by special leave against the judgments dated 14.8.2002 of the High Court of Kerala in W.A. No. 1178/1997, WA No. 1170/1997 and WA No. 1135/1997 involve common questions of fact and law.
2. The appellants and the private respondents were recruited as Lower Division Clerks (LDCs) in the Registration Department, in different districts of the State of Kerala. In the cadre hierarchy, the promotion post for LDCs is that of Upper Division Clerk (‘UDC’ for short). The post of LDC is a district-wise post and the post of UDC is a State-wise Post. In other words, the unit for recruitment of LDCs is the district and the unit for recruitment of UDCs is the entire State. A State-wise seniority list of LDCs is maintained for promotion to the post of UDCs.
3. The Appellants were recruited as LDCs in district X. The contesting private respondents were recruited as LDCs in other districts (say, district Y or district Z) and were transferred, on their own request to district X. (For convenience, we will refer to the appellants as ‘Local LDCs’ and the contesting private respondents as ‘transferred LDCs’). The transferred LDCs., on own request transfers, were permit
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.