JUDGMENT

B.P. Singh, J. — These two appeals by special leave have been preferred by the appellant against the judgment and order of the Gauhati High Court in MA (F) No. 180 of 1996 dated May 19, 2000 and the order passed in Review Petition No. 85 of 2000 dated July 28, 2000. The High Court by its judgment and order impugned dismissed the appeal preferred by the appellant against the order of the Railway Claims Tribunal, Guwahati Bench dated August 30, 1996 in Application No. 915 of 1993. The review petition preferred against the judgment and order of the High Court was also rejected by order dated July 28, 2000.

2. The factual background in which the dispute arose is as follows :-

Two consignments of iodised salt were booked in favour of the appellant. The first consignment consisted of 767 bags and the second 744 bags. These consignments were not delivered. The appellant, therefore, lodged two claims dated April 26, 1991 claiming the value of the said goods, namely Rs. 53,264/- and Rs. 51,686/- in respect of the two consignments. By letters dated April 7, 1993 (despatched in August, 1993) the Railways admitted the claims only to an extent of Rs. 9,111/- and Rs. 9,032/- and enclosed t