SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(SC) 609

ARIJIT PASAYAT, S.H.KAPADIA
State of A. P. – Appellant
Versus
S. Narasimha Kumar – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Arijit Pasayat, J. — This petition has been filed by wife of one D.V. Chandrasekhar who was accused no.3 in C.C. No.53/1990 and was respondent no.3 in the appeal. It is to be noted that the appeal has been filed against the judgment rendered by a learned Single Judge of the Andhra Pradesh High Court disposing of several Criminal Revision petitions.

2. All those revision petitions related to the judgment of the Court of the VII Additional Munsif Magistrate, Guntur in C.C. No.53 of 1990. The accused persons are described as A-1, A-2, A-3 etc. A-1 was charged with offences punishable under Sections 381, 411 and 120-B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short IPC); A-2 to A-11 and A-15 were charged with offences punishable under Sections 120-B and 414 I.P.C. A-12 to A-14 were charged with offence punishable under Section 411 I.P.C. A-4 died during the trial of the case. The case against A-10 was separated. Through its Judgment dated 26.11.2000 the trial Court convicted the above said accused persons for the offences alleged against them and awarded sentences of various descriptions.

3. The High Court set aside the conviction and sentence imposed in respect of the concer
























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top