SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(SC) 636

ARIJIT PASAYAT, LOKESHWAR SINGH PANTA
State Of Gujarat – Appellant
Versus
Karshanbhai K. Rabari – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Arijit Pasayat, J. — Leave granted.

2. The State of Gujarat and Superintending Engineer, Capital Project Circle, Gandhinagar, Gujarat, question legality of the judgment rendered by a Division Bench of the Gujarat High Court. By the impugned judgment the Division Bench set aside the judgment of a learned Single judge who had dismissed the writ petition filed by the respondents. Learned Single Judge held that the respondents were daily workers who were temporarily appointed for transitory work on a work charge basis and could not be treated at par with regular employees who were appointed on the basis of Recruitment Rules.

3. The Division Bench by the impugned judgment held that the respondents were entitled to all the benefits available to permanent employees of the State Government under the Government Resolution dated 17.10.1988 and no order diluting/reversing the same can/could be passed by any other Authority/Functionaries of the State Government. Accordingly the Letters Patent Appeal filed by the respondents was allowed and the Communication/Order dated 12.8.1991 by the State Government was quashed. It was held that benefits apart from those clearly mentioned in the reso
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top