SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(SC) 605

S.H.KAPADIA, ARIJIT PASAYAT
Union of India – Appellant
Versus
R. Bhusal – Respondent


ORDER

Arijit Pasayat, J. — Union of India calls in question legality of the judgment rendered by a Division Bench of the Delhi High Court allowing the writ petition filed by the respondent. By the impugned judgment, High Court directed the present appellant to grant the writ petitioner a permanent commission. It was further directed that alternate employability was to be given, keeping in view his medical fitness.

2. Background facts in a nutshell are as follows:-

The respondent was granted Short Service Commission with No. 13 Helicopter Short Service Commission Course on 19.2.1993. His initial terms was for ten years as per terms and conditions of service. In February 2001, he was considered for grant of permanent commission. The suitability assessment consisted of minimum demonstrated performance and medical fitness. The former was to be gauzed from the grading in the confidential annual reports for the previous three years and on the basis of mandatory qualities like professional knowledge, job proficiency integrity, loyality, dependability, sense of responsibility, courage (mental and physical), bearing and demeanour. For grant of permanent commission, a minimum average of 6.5 in










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top