SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(SC) 708

A.K.MATHUR, N.S.HEGDE, S.B.SINHA
KALYAN CHANDRA SARKAR – Appellant
Versus
RAJESH RANJAN ALIAS PAPPUYADAV – Respondent


ORDER

1. We have perused the reports filed by the Home Secretary, Superintendent of Jail, Beur, Patna, Bihar, Superintendent, Patna Medical College Hospital as also the report filed by CBI. It is clear from the said reports that though respondent Rajesh Ranjan @ Pappu Yadav is suffering d from some ailment in one of his legs, the ailment is not such that requires 24-hour treatment or continuous observations by doctor, much less is his presence in the hospital continuously necessary. This is clear from the following facts: while in custody he himself has made an application to attend the Legislative Assembly proceedings (which prayer was not granted by the Court). He prayed for and obtained permission from the High Court to e travel to Purnea from Patna to file nomination to contest the election in the recently concluded Lok Sabha elections. He also sought permission for four weeks to canvass in the said constituency (though this was not granted). He was also able to travel to Madhepura to attend the case in Fast Track Court I

at Madhepura. All these travels are made without having a medical certificate certifying that he is fit to travel or any doctor accompanying him. It is also f





Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top