SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(SC) 287

MANOJ NARULA – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent


Judgment

( 1 ) THE original petition from which this review petition arises was dismissed by this Court on 16-7-2004 on the ground that the issue raised in this petition was being debated in Parliament, therefore, it is too premature a stage for entertaining such a petition.

( 2 ) THIS review petition is filed alleging that since the order was made by this Court on 16-7-2004, the issue has not yet been debated in Parliament and the same is not likely to be debated in the near future.

( 3 ) A counter-affidavit is filed by the Deputy Secretary to the Government of India, Ministry of Home Affairs wherein it is specifically stated that the issue could not be debated till now for certain reasons but assurance has been given that when the occasion arises the matter will certainly be debated in parliament. Recording the said assurance this review petition is dismissed. Contempt Petition (C) No. 31 of 2005 in RP (C) No. 1633 of 2004 in WP (C) no. 271 of 2004

( 4 ) WE find no merit in this petition. The contempt petition is dismissed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top