MANOJ NARULA – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent
Judgment
( 1 ) THE original petition from which this review petition arises was dismissed by this Court on 16-7-2004 on the ground that the issue raised in this petition was being debated in Parliament, therefore, it is too premature a stage for entertaining such a petition.
( 2 ) THIS review petition is filed alleging that since the order was made by this Court on 16-7-2004, the issue has not yet been debated in Parliament and the same is not likely to be debated in the near future.
( 3 ) A counter-affidavit is filed by the Deputy Secretary to the Government of India, Ministry of Home Affairs wherein it is specifically stated that the issue could not be debated till now for certain reasons but assurance has been given that when the occasion arises the matter will certainly be debated in parliament. Recording the said assurance this review petition is dismissed. Contempt Petition (C) No. 31 of 2005 in RP (C) No. 1633 of 2004 in WP (C) no. 271 of 2004
( 4 ) WE find no merit in this petition. The contempt petition is dismissed.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.