SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(SC) 983

KOHINOOR ELASTICS (P)LTD. – Appellant
Versus
COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, INDORE – Respondent


Judgment

( 1 ) CIVIL Appeal No. 3197 of 2000 is by the manufacturer against the judgment of the Customs, Excise and Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal, new Delhi ("cegat") dated 24-12-1999 wherein it has been held that the manufacturer is not entitled to the benefit of Notification No. 1/93-CE dated 28-2-1993. Civil Appeal No. 1469 of 2002 is by the Commissioner of Central excise against the judgment dated 5-9-2001 wherein for a subsequent assessment year CEGAT followed the judgment of the Full Bench of the tribunal in the case of Prakash Industries v. CCE and held that the manufacturer (same assessee) is entitled to the benefit of Notification No. 1/93-CE, dated 28-2-1993. As parties are same and the point for consideration is the same both the appeals are being dealt with by this common order. Hereinafter parties will be referred to in their capacity in a civil Appeal No. 3197 of 2000.

( 2 ) THE question for consideration, in both these appeals, is whether or not the appellants i. e. M/s Kohinoor Elastics Private Limited are entitled to the benefit of the aforementioned notification. The appellants manufacture elastics as per specific orders of customers, who are manufacturers of u









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top