Back
2005 Supreme(SC) 1151
Supreme Court Of India
B.P. SINGH AND S.H. KAPADIA, JJ.
DHARAM VEER SINGH AND OTHERS - Petitioners;
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS - Respondents.
Writ Petition (C) No. 413 of 2003
Decided on September 6,2005
Advocates appeared
S.K. Verma, Advocate, for the Petitioners;
Ajay Siwach, Pardeep Dahiya and T.V. George, Advocates, for the Respondents.
Headnote:
Consolidation scheme regarding Shamlat deh - Challenged by some land holders affected by the scheme- High Court dismissed writ- The said writ petition having been dismissed, Civil Appeal No. 646 of 2000 was preferred before the Supreme Court by Special Leave- Despite the order of status-quo granted by Supreme Court pending the appeal, the petitioners alleged that they were before displaced since they were not parties in the writ petition filed before the High Court-Writ petition dismissed[Paras 1 to 3]
Judgment
B.P. SINGH, J.- This writ petition has been filed by some of the landholders who are affected by the Consolidation Scheme framed in regard to Shamlat Deh lands of the villages concerned. The said Scheme was challenged by some other proprietors and co-sharers in Civil Writ Petition No. 18310 of 1998 before the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh. The said writ petition having been dismissed, Civil Appeal No. 646 of 20001 was preferred before this Court by special leave. Despite the order of status quo granted by this Court pending the appeal, the petitioners alleged that they were being displaced since they were not parties in the writ petition filed before the High Court.
2. They, therefore, filed the instant writ petition which has been heard along with Civil Appeal No. 646 of 2000.1
3. We have delivered our judgment today dismissing Civil Appeal No. 646 of 20001. We find no merit in this writ petition filed by the petitioners and the same is accordingly dismissed.
