SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(SC) 134

S.N.VARIAVA, H.K.SEMA
T. STANES and CO. LTD. – Appellant
Versus
State Of T. N. – Respondent


ORDER

1. Heard Mr Gopal Subramanium, learned Senior Counsel, at great length.

2. These special leave petitions are against the judgment of the High Court of Madras dated 16-9-2004 wherein the High Court has dismissed the writ petition filed by the appellant refusing to follow another judgment of the High Court in the case of Metal Sales Corpn. v. Jt. CTO1 and preferring to follow a judgment of the same High Court in the case of Swastik Household and Industrial Products v. State of T.N.2

3. The question involved is whether Section 22 of the T.N. General Sales Tax Act bars the appellant from collecting in any manner amounts paid by them to the seller by way of tax. The relevant portion of Section 22 reads as follows:

"22. Collection of tax by dealer.-(l) No person who is not a registered dealer shall collect any amount by way of tax or purporting to be by way of tax under this Act; and no registered dealer shall make any such collection except in accordance with the provisions of this Act and the rules made thereunder:

Provided that nothing in this sub-section shall apply to the collection of an amount by a registered dealer, towards the amount of tax already suffered under this Act

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top