SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(SC) 834

ASHOK BHAN, S.H.KAPADIA
A. AMBIKAMBA DEAD BY LRS – Appellant
Versus
B. RANAGASWAMY DEAD BY LRS. – Respondent


ORDER

1. The High Court while hearing the first appeal was supposed to deal with the questions on fact as well as law. The High Court has set aside the order of the trial court without disturbing many of the findings which had been recorded by the trial court. We are not satisfied with the judgment rendered by the High Court in the first appeal. The judgment under appeal is, therefore, set aside and the case is remitted back to the High Court for fresh decision in accordance with law.

2. The Registry is directed to remit the records which have been received here to the Registry of the High Court forthwith.

3. The parties would be at liberty to move the Honble the Chief Justice of the High Court for an early disposal of the appeal.

4. The appeal is disposed of in the abovementioned terms.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top