SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(SC) 226

C.K.THAKKER, RUMA PAL, ARIJIT PASAYAT
COLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE and CUSTOMS – Appellant
Versus
P. M. P. COMPONENTS LTD. – Respondent


ORDER

1. The issue raised in this appeal is where there are different prices for different dealers of the same class of buyers by way of commercial f consideration whether such prices cannot be rejected. The identical issue had already been decided in favour of the assessee by the Tribunal in Gora Mal Hari Ram Ltd. v. CCEI. Although a submission was raised before the Tribunal which was minded to follow the decision in Gora Mal Hari Ram Ltd.1 that the decision had been challenged before this Court, it appears that this was an incorrect submission. The Department has in fact accepted the 9 decision in Gora Mal Hari Ram Ltd.1 and has not impugned the same. The Tribunal having merely relied upon the decision in Gora Mal Hari Ram Ltd.1 we see no reason to interfere with the decision of the Tribunal.

2. The appeal is dismissed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top