SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(SC) 161

RUMA PAL, C.K.THAKKER
RAJ KUMAR MEHROTRA – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent


ORDER

1. Leave granted.

2. The appellant was posted as Executive Engineer at Swaran Rekha Project, Chandil lift main canal between 3-3-1989 to 16-1-1991. On 1-11-1990, a charge-sheet was t1led against the appellant alleging irregularities in the work carried out by the appellant in connection with the aforesaid project. According to the appellant, which has not been disputed by the respondents, inquiries were made at different levels subsequent to the f charge-sheet but nothing implicating the appellant was found. In fact, in 1998, the appellant was promoted. Subsequent to his promotion, a supplementary charge-sheet was issued to the appellant again in respect of allegations relating to the work at the Swaran Rekha Project. The appellant filed an answer to the second charge-sheet. On 22-1-2000, an order was passed by the respondents saying that the charges, as made, had been proved 9 against the appellant. There is no further reason given. On the basis of this "proof the following punishments were imposed on the appellant, namely,

(a) censure in his confidential report of the year 1989-90,

(b) withholding of promotion for 7 years from the due date, and (c) token recovery of Rs 5,00






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top