Back
Supreme Court Of India
N. SANTOSH HEGDE AND S.B. SINHA, JJ.
MONA (SMT) - Petitioner
Versus
RAMANDEEP AGGARWAL - Respondent
Transfer Petition (C) No. 460 of 2004,
Decided on February 14, 2005
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 25 - Matrimonial dispute - Transfer of -
Taking into consideration the convenience of the parties and the apprehension entertained by the husband instead of transferring it to Ambala as prayed for by the petitioner, the case transfered to Kurukshetra, Haryana [Para 3 ]
ORDER
1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.
2. Petition admitted.
3. On the facts and circumstances of the case, we are inclined to transfer the matrimonial petition from Delhi. Taking into consideration the convenience of the parties and the apprehension entertained by the husband instead of transferring it to Ambala as prayed for by the petitioner, we think it appropriate to transfer the case to Kurukshetra, Haryana. Therefore, we direct HMAQ Case No. 643 of 2003 titled Ramandeep Aggarwal v. Mona from the Court of District and Sessions Judge, Tis Hazari, Delhi to the Court of Principal District Judge, Kurukshetra, Haryana who will try the case himself or transfer it to the court of competent jurisdiction for disposal in accordance with law.
4. The transfer petition is allowed.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
