SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(SC) 372

RUMA PAL, C.K.THAKKER
M. SIVAGAMI – Appellant
Versus
R. RAJA – Respondent


ORDER

1. Leave granted.

2. The parties were married in 1999. On 26-2-2001, a child was born to them. The dispute arose between the parties culminating in proceedings under Section 498-A of the Criminal Procedure Code filed by the appellant wife against the respondent husband. According to the respondent husband, he has since been acquitted in respect of one of the proceedings and the other proceeding had been withdrawn by the appellant herself. A divorce petition was filed by the respondent husband on 30-9-2002 before the Family Court at Coimbatore. The appellant has been appearing in the proceedings from time to time and cross-examined the witnesses produced by the respondent husband. In June 2004 she made an application for maintenance in the court within the jurisdiction of which she resides in Namakkal. She then filed an application before the High Court for transferring the divorce proceedings filed by the respondent from Coimbatore to Namakkal. The High Court has dismissed the proceedings, being of the view that sufficient grounds had not been made out for the transfer of the matter from Coimbatore to Namakkal.

3. Before us it appears that the grievance of the appellant is ba


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top