SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(SC) 1122

ARUN KUMAR, ARIJIT PASAYAT
V. D. CHAUDHARY – Appellant
Versus
State Of U. P. – Respondent


Judgment

ARIJIT PASAYAT, J.- Leave granted.

2. The informant calls in question legality of the order passed by a learned Single Judge of the Allahabad High Court granting bail to Respondent 2 (hereinafter referred to as "the accused").

3. Background facts sans unnecessary details are as follows:

On 5-2-2000 the complainant lodged the first information report. It was stated therein that when he and his son were attending a marriage party, the respondent-accused started firing shots from his gun. When he was asked not to do so, he did not stop and continued the tiring. The appellants son Saurabh received injuries due to the shots fired by the accused and he died due to the injuries. Initially, the police registered a case alleging commission of offences punishable under Sections 304-A and 338 of the Penal Code, 1860 (in short "IPC"). After investigation charge-sheet was filed under Sections 304 and 338 IPC. Cognizance was taken and process was issued. The accused filed an application for being released on bail. By the impugned order bail has been granted.

4. According to the appellant, the accused was absconding for about 2 years. His prayer for bail was initially rejected. Non-bailab












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top