B. N. SRIKRISHNA, R. C. LAHOTI, H. K. SEMA
DEBASHIS ROY – Appellant
Versus
CALCUTTA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION – Respondent
ORDER
1. Leave granted.
2. There is a property known as Vivek Vihar, Premises No. 13/3, Ballygunge Circular Road, Calcutta. The property is situated in a prime locality of the cosmopolitan city of Calcutta. The owner-cum-builder constructed the multi-storeyed building which, as we are told, consists of 7 storeys and 27 flats. When the building plans were initially sanctioned by the Calcutta Municipal Corporation, a substantial area on the ground floor was shown as parking space. We are told that during the course of the hearing that most of the flat-owners have purchased and paid for individual parking space. Nevertheless, the disputed portion of the ground floor was shown in the plan as parking space.
3. In the year 1994, the building owner is alleged to have entered into an agreement for sale of little less than 2000 sq ft area of the ground floor in favour of Respondent 6, M/s Maitry Resources Pvt. Ltd. It is also not in dispute that till date there is no deed of sale executed by the owner in favour of Respondent 6. On 19-2-2001, Respondent 6 moved an application to the Calcutta Municipal Corporation seeking change of use under Section 416 of the Calcutta Municipal Corporation A
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.