ORDER

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and second respondent who argued on behalf of himself and the other respondents also.

2. Delay condoned.

3. Leave granted.

4. The appellant Savita in one of the appeals herein filed a complaint alleging offences punishable under Sections 498-A and 406 IPC against the respondents herein which was registered as FIR No. 33 dated 1-6-2001 by the Mahila Police Station, Bikaner. The said FIR was challenged by the respondents herein before the High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan at Jodhpur, which by the impugned order proceeded to quash the FIR holding that the FIR prima facie does not disclose any cognizable offence against any of the respondents herein and allegations taken in their entirety ex facie are vague in nature.

S. The appellant Savita in her complaint had specifically stated that among other things "the husband of the complainant also started to abuse her and beat her and all the remaining accused used derogatory language to the appellant and used to say that her father and mother did not give anything to them". She had further complained that "two years ago on an evening accused, Kamlesh, Bhagyawati, Shankuntala, Anamika an