SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(SC) 436

A.K.MATHUR, ASHOK BHAN
GURDEV SINGH – Appellant
Versus
DARYA SINGH – Respondent


ORDER

1. This appeal is directed against an order of the Single Judge of the Punjab and Haryana High Court at Chandigarh in Civil Revision No. 4247 of 1995. The High Court by the impugned order has set aside the order passed b by the executing court accepting the objections filed by the judgment-debtors (the appellants herein) under Section 47 read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure against the execution of a decree dated 27-5-1991 passed in favour of the decree-holder (the respondent herein).

2. The High Court has held that technically the judgment-debtor may be right in contending that there was no decree for possession and redemption of c mortgage but in substance the decree was for possession on deposit of Rs 30,000 which was the mortgage amount. The order of the executing court was set aside and objection filed under Section 47 CPC by the appellants dismissed.

3. Aggrieved against the aforesaid findings of the High Court, the present appeal has been filed.

4. We agree with the contention advanced by the learned counsel for the appellant that technically, in the absence of a decree for possession by redemption of mortgage, the decree-holder could not execute the dec

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top