R. C. LAHOTI, G. P. MATHUR, P. P. NAOLEKAR
N. R. GOVINDARAJAN – Appellant
Versus
V. K. RAJAGOPALAN – Respondent
ORDER
1. Leave granted.
2. There is an objection taken in the written statement that the court fee paid by the plaintiff is deficit and the plea deserves to be heard and decided as a preliminary issue in terms of Section 12(2) of the Tamil Nadu Court Fees g and Suits Valuation Act, 1955.
3. The learned counsel for the appellant (the defendant in the trial court) submits that the issue as to court fee can be heard and decided as a preliminary legal issue, inasmuch as the appellant does not propose to adduce any evidence in support of the plea taken in the written statement in this regard. That being the stand taken, we are satisfied that in terms of Rule 2 Order 14 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, as amended by Act 104 of 1976, the issue could have been heard and decided as a preliminary issue.
4. The appeal is allowed. The impugned order of the High Court is set aside. The trial court is directed to frame an issue on the question of court fee in terms of the plea raised in the written statement and hear and decide the same as a preliminary issue before proceeding ahead.
5. No order as to costs.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.