SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(SC) 154

Supreme Court Of India
K.G. BALAKRISHNAN AND TARUN CHATTERJEE, JJ.
SUMAN BALA - Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS - Respondents
Civil Appeal No. 769 of 2005,
Decided on January 28, 2005

Headnote:

Departmental enquiry - Hearing of appeal-Disciplinary proceedings- Appellant found guilty and her increments were withheld for a period of three years- In appeal Commissioner of Income Tax confirmed the punishment- Writ petition challenging the order was also dismissed- It was contended disciplinary proceedings were initiated at the instance of the then Commissioner of Income Tax, the appeal preferred by the appellant was also heard by the very same officer- Held it was improper - In view of the facts and circumstances, the orders passed by the Appellate Tribunal as well as the High Court set aside- Present Commissioner of Income Tax directed to hear and decide the appeal according to law ( para 4 )

ORDER

1. Leave granted.

2. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

3. The appellant was working as stenographer and was absent from duty from 11-10-1997 to 16-12-1997 and from 18-12-1997 till disciplinary proceedings were initiated against her. She was found guilty and her increments were withheld for a period of three years. Aggrieved by the same the appellant filed appeal before the Commissioner of Income Tax and the punishment was confirmed. She filed a writ petition challenging the order. However, the writ petition was dismissed. Against the said order the present appeal is filed.

4. Counsel for the appellant points out that disciplinary proceedings were initiated at the instance of the then Commissioner of Income Tax, Mrs S.K. Aulakh and the appeal preferred by the appellant was heard by the very same officer and therefore the whole proceedings are vitiated. We find some force in the contention. In view of the facts and circumstances, we set aside the orders passed by the Appellate Tribunal as well as the High Court and direct that the appeal preferred by the appellant be heard by the present Commissioner of Income Tax, Jalandhar and dispose of the appeal on merits in accordance with law.

5. The appeal is disposed of accordingly.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top