SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(SC) 119

Y.K.SABHARWAL, P.P.NAOLEKAR
GLOBAL INFRASTRUCTURE and TECHNOLOGIES LTD. – Appellant
Versus
G. K. BUILDERS – Respondent


ORDER

1. Heard the learned counsel for the parties.

2. Leave granted.

3. By the common impugned judgment, the High Court has transferred some of the cases from Mumbai to Pune, some from Pune to Mumbai and some from Sholapur to Mumbai filed under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. Admittedly, as of now, twenty-six complaint cases, details whereof are given in the impugned judgment, are pending in various courts at a Mumbai, Pune and Sholapur. Ten complaint cases are pending in the courts at Mumbai and ten at Pune and six complaint cases are pending in the Magisterial Court at Sholapur.

4. The learned counsel for the parties have agreed that all the twenty-six complaint cases shall be heard and decided by the appropriate courts at Pune, which means that ten complaint cases pending in various Magisterial Courts at Mumbai and six complaint cases pending at Sholapur shall be transferred to the appropriate court at Pune.

5. In view of the aforesaid, we set aside the impugned judgment and direct that ten complaint cases pending at Mumbai and six complaint cases pending at Sholapur, details whereof are given in paras (3) and (5) of the impugned judgment respectively, shall stan


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top