SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(SC) 123

H.K.SEMA, S.N.VARIAVA
OSWAL PETROCHEMICALS – Appellant
Versus
GOVT. OF MAHARASHTRA – Respondent


ORDER

1. Leave granted.

2. Heard parties.

3. In view of the judgment of this Court in Cipla Ltd. v. Maharashtra General Kamgar Union1 the question whether employee-and-employer b relationship exists cannot be decided by the Industrial Court. It would necessarily have to be decided in proceedings under Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act. We, therefore, grant to the workmen one months time to raise their dispute. Pending the decision on the reference, the interim order which had been passed on 3-11-1997 will continue to operate. In view of the above order the impugned judgment stands set aside.

4. At this stage Mr Manish Singhvi, learned counsel appearing for the appellant applies that the appellant may be allowed to retrench the workers. It is for the Company to decide what steps it wants to take. No liberty is required from us to do so. If they are entitled to do so, they may do so.

5. The appeals stand disposed of accordingly. There will be no order as to costs.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top