Supreme Court Of India
RUMA PAL AND C.K. THAKKER, JJ.
PREMCHAND JINRAJSA SAHUJI (DEAD) BY LRS.- Appellant
Versus
SURENDRA - Respondent.
Civil Appeal No. 2501 of 2005,
Decided on April 8, 2005
Custody - Child Welfare - Expert Report on Psychological Impact
Fact of the Case:
The court granted leave and set aside the impugned order, directing the High Court to consider a report from a child psychiatrist before affirming the lower court's decision on custody.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that it would be difficult to obtain the presence of the parties for examination and directed the High Court to appoint a child psychiatrist to assess the potential adverse psychological impact on the child if custody is transferred to the father.
Issues: Custody of the child, Psychological impact assessment
Ratio Decidendi: The High Court should consider a report from a child psychiatrist before affirming the lower court's decision on custody, and the psychiatrist should assess the potential adverse psychological impact on the child if custody is transferred to the father.
Final Decision: The appeal was disposed of without any order as to costs, with the direction for the High Court to appoint a child psychiatrist and expedite the process within two months.
ORDER
1. Leave granted.
2. There has been no response from Dr. Bhagat. In any event, as has been pertinently pointed out by the learned counsel appearing for the parties, it would be difficult to obtain the presence of the parties from so far as Aurangabad for the purpose of having the girl, who is the subject-matter of the custody petition, examined. In that view of the matter, we dispose of the appeal by setting aside the order impugned only on the ground that the High Court should consider the report of a child psychiatrist before affirming the order of the lower court. The High Court will appoint such doctor as an expert to submit a report giving his/her opinion as to whether, in the given circumstances, there will be an adverse psychological impact on the child if the custody of the child is made over to the father from the relatives of the deceased mother of the child. The psychiatrist should be enabled to take the assistance of any such welfare worker as he/she may desire for the purpose. The parties including the child must appear before such doctor as may be nominated by the High Court as and when required. It is requested that the High Court may expedite the process and, if possible, complete the process within a period of two months from the date of the receipt of the copy of this order.
3. The appeal is, accordingly, disposed of but without any order as to costs.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.