SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(SC) 74

R. C. LAHOTI, G. P. MATHUR
EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, PWD, BATHINDA – Appellant
Versus
BALRAJ KUMAR BANSAL – Respondent


ORDER

1. Leave granted.

2. The judgment of the trial court by which an award under the Arbitration Act, 1940 was made a rule of the court is under appeal filed by the Executive Engineer, PWD (B&R) Branch, Bathinda before the High Court. During the pendency of the appeal, the High Court directed the f execution of decree to remain stayed subject to the appellant depositing the decretal amount within the time appointed by the Court. It appears that the appellant deposited an amount of Rs 33,75,921 which deposit fell short by Rs 20,49,474 (as on the date of the order of the High Court impugned herein). The High Court formed an opinion that the appellant was in default and therefore directed the interim order of stay to be vacated. Feeling g aggrieved by that order this appeal has been filed by special leave.

3. The appeal is yet to be heard by the High Court. Today it is stated at the Bar that the amount of Rs 33 lakhs and odd deposited by the appellant has been withdrawn by the respondent and the balance amount is yet to be deposited by the appellant. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties, we are of the opinion that the following order to be passed in supersession of the




Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top