SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(SC) 1014

P.VENKATARAMA REDDI, D.M.DHARMADHIKARI
PEERAPPA – Appellant
Versus
State of Karnataka – Respondent


JUDGMENT

P. VENKATARAMA REDDI, J.-- The three appellants herein are Accused A-2, A-3 and A-4 in Sessions Case No. 30 of 1989 on the file of the First Additional Sessions Judge, Gulbarga. They, along with nine others, were charged with the offences under Sections 147, 148 and 302 read with 149 IPC. Accused 7 died during the pendency of the sessions case. The other eleven accused including the appellants herein were acquitted by the trial court. The State of Karnataka filed the appeal in the High Court questioning the acquittal. During the pendency of the appeal, Accused 1 died. Hence the appeal had abated against him. The High Court, on reappreciation of evidence, held that the trial court acquitted Accused 1 to 4 "on flimsy grounds by rejecting the evidence of PW s 4 and 5 and other circumstantial evidence". The High Court observed that no second view was possible as far as the guilt of Accused 1 to 4 was concerned. The High Court felt that the trial Judge gave undue importance to minor aspects in rejecting the testimony of PWs 4 and 5. Accordingly, the High Court allowed the appeal to the extent of convicting Accused 2 to 4 (the appellants herein). As A-1 died, he was not convicted






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top