SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(SC) 373

RUMA PAL, C.K.THAKKER
BALBIR SINGH WASU – Appellant
Versus
LAKHBIR SINGH – Respondent


ORDER

1. Leave granted.

2. The question raised in this appeal is as to whether the High Court was d correct in dismissing the appellants challenge to probate proceedings filed by the respondent on the basis of Section 10 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The High Court was of the view that the mere fact that the appellant had filed civil suit, inter alia, challenging the execution of the Will in question, did not in any way debar the High Court from entertaining probate proceedings in respect of that Will.

3. The only ground on which we entertained the SLP at the outset was the question whether contentious probate proceedings could go on despite Section 10 of the Code of Civil Procedure.

4. It is not in dispute that the Civil Judge before whom the appellant had filed the suit for declaration and injunction would not have the jurisdiction to entertain the probate proceedings. According to the learned counsel f appearing on behalf of the appellant, nevertheless the principles underlying Section 10 of the Code of Civil Procedure would apply because any decision on the civil suit would non-suit the respondent in the probate proceedings and the issues in the civil suit would overlap the i



Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top