SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(SC) 1298

Supreme Court Of India
S.B. SINHA AND R.V. RAVEENDRAN, JJ.
SARUP SINGH-Appellant
Versus
STATE OF PUNJAB - Respondent
Criminal Appeal No. 991 of 2004,
Decided on October 4, 2005
Advocates appeared
Anil Kr. Srivastava (Amicus Curiae), Advocate, for the Appellant;
Arun K. Sinha, Rakesh Singh and Mukesh Kr. Sinha, Advocates, for the Respondent.

Headnote:Appeal dismissed

JUDGMENT

S.B. SINHA, J.- The appellant herein with one Dilbagh Singh and Baljit Singh was tried and convicted for commission of offence of housebreaking by night, to commit murder of Kans Kaur; for attempts on the lives of Joginder Singh and Avtar Singh and also for the illegal use of their firearms. They were found guilty and were sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life for the murder of Kans Kaur and lesser sentences for the other offences. All the sentences were directed to run concurrently.

2. Baljit Singh was married to Sukhwinder Kaur, daughter of Joginder Singh (PW 2) and Kans Kaur. Owing to alleged demand of dowry, Sukhwinder Kaur came back to her parents from her matrimonial home which gave rise to strained relationship between the parties. Baljit Singh tried to forcibly take away Sukhwinder Kaur on a few occasions but her parents did not permit her to go with him whereupon Panchayat intervened resulting in execution of a purported agreement of informal divorce.

3. The said Baljit Singh, Dilbagh Singh as also the appellant herein were constables. All of them were deputed on patrol duty at a naka set up at Fatuwal, GT Road. Their duty hours were between 8 p.m. on 20-2-1995 to 8 a.m. on 21-2-1995. Nachhatarpal Singh (PW 14) was working as a helper in a vehicle bearing Registration No. PB-08-4886. He along with the driver, Paramjit Singh of the said vehicle was on his way back to Jalandhar from Jandiala Guru after unloading paper. When the said vehicle reached Fatuwal, 9 allegedly the accused stopped the same and asked the driver to take him and other accused persons to Kot Budha. Baljit Singh was armed with self-loading rifle and the appellant and Dilbagh Singh were armed with .303 rifles. It is not in dispute that the said rifles were issued to the accused persons with ammunition. Kot Budha is situated at a distance of 45 km from Fatuwal. All the three accused at that time were in police uniform. On h reaching the informants (Joginder Singhs) house, they scaled over the wall of the courtyard. Gurpreet Kaur (PW 1) was sleeping with her mother Kans Kaur, the deceased. Joginder Singh was sleeping in another room, while Sukhwinder Kaur, Inderjit Kaur and Sarabjit Singh were sleeping in a third room. Baljit Singh and Dilbagh Singh knocked at the door of the room where Gurpreet Kaur and Kans Kaur were sleeping and then at the door of Joginder Singhs room. On hearing the voice of Joginder Singh, they broke down the door with the butts of their rifles and fired at him. Thereafter, they broke down the door of the room where Gurpreet Kaur was sleeping and dragged Kans Kaur out. Despite pleas from Sukhwinder Kaur and her two sisters not to kill their mother, they fired shots at Kans Kaur. Avtar Singh, a cousin of Gurpreet Kaur also reached the courtyard by scaling the wall. A shot was fired at him by the appellant herein. The three accused thereafter ran away. The death of Kans Kaur and injuries suffered by Avtar Singh and Joginder Singh is not in dispute.

4. Before the learned trial Judge, the prosecution examined Gurpreet Kaur, PW 1, Joginder Singh, PW 2 and Avtar Singh, PW 3. Dr. Gurpal Singh, PW 4 performed autopsy and submitted a report therefor. Nachhatarpal Singh, PW 14, as noticed hereinbefore, was a helper of the vehicle wherein the appellant, Dilbagh Singh and Baljit Singh travelled from Fatuwal to Kot Budha.

5. The prosecution also examined Inspector Dharam Singh to prove the absence of the three accused from duty from 11 p.m. on 20-2-1995. Issuance of firearms and ammunition to all of them was proved by Head Constable Gurmail Singh (PW 16). The injuries on the person of Avtar Singh and Joginder Singh were proved by Dr. Rana Verma. Although a plea of breach of procedures as regard holding of test identification parade was raised by Dilbagh Singh, no such plea was taken by the appellant herein.

6. The contention of the appellant herein before the trial court was that he having not been named in the first information r

























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top