S.B.SINHA, R.V.RAVEENDRAN
PONDICHERRY – Appellant
Versus
V. RAMAKRISHNAN – Respondent
Judgment
S.B. SINHA, J.- Leave granted.
2. The first respondent herein was appointed on deputation as Chief Engineer of the Public Works Department, Government of Pondicherry on short-term deputation/temporary basis pending selection of the regular incumbent by the Union Public Service Commission (UPSC) with effect from 1-7-2004. He was repatriated to his parent department on 14-2-2005 and relieved of his duties on the same day. Questioning the same, an original application was filed before the Central Administrative Tribunal on 25-22005 praying inter alia therein:
" ... it is humbly prayed that this Honble Tribunal may be pleased to quash the order passed by the second respondent in No. A.22012/I/PW 1/Al/2002 (Part) dated 14-2-2005 as illegal and unconstitutional and thus render justice."
3. R. Sundar Raju (appellant in the connected appeal), Superintending Engineer, having three years experience, who was holding the current charge of the duties of the post of Chief Engineer at that time, in the meanwhile had filed an application questioning the deputation of the first respondent herein. In the said original application, the Government of Pondicherry inter alia raised a contention
(2000) 5 SCC 362: 2000 SCC (L&S) 705. Kunai Nanda v. Union of India
(1998) 4 SCC 65: 1998 SCC (L&S) 995
(1998) 4 SCC 114: 1998 SCC (L&S) 1018. Vimai Kumari v. State of Haryana
(2001) 5 SCC 482: 2001 SCC (L&S) 855
(2004) 2 SCC 65. Bahadursinh Lakhubhai Gohil v. Jagdishbhai M. Kamalia
(2005) 6 SCC 776. Punjab SEB Ltd. v. Zora Singh
1958 SCR 828: AIR 1958 SC 36. Parshotam Lai Dhingra v. Union of India
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.