ARIJIT PASAYAT
STATE OF UTTARANCHAL – Appellant
Versus
JAGPAL SINGH TYAGI – Respondent
Judgment
ARIJIT PASAYAT, J.
( 1 ) THE appellant State calls in question legality of the judgment rendered by the learned Single Judge of the Uttaranchal High court.
( 2 ) A brief reference to the factual background will be necessary: the respondent (hereinafter referred to as "the employee") was a work-charged employee in Irrigation Research Institute, Roorkee. The project was completed on 28/2/1982 and like other similarly work-charged employees his services came to an end. Order in this regard was passed on 25/2/1982. The respondent employee raised a dispute before the Conciliation officer, Saharanpur in 1988 who after examining the claim dismissed it on 25/1/1990 and no reference was made under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (in short "the Act" ). A writ petition was filed by the respondent employee before the Allahabad High Court which was dismissed. However, the respondent employee was permitted to make a representation or to approach the Government for a fresh consideration. The State Government referred the dispute to the Labour Court which directed reinstatement with 50% back wages. Both the State Government and the employee filed writ petitions. The High Court dismissed
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.