SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(SC) 662

P.P.NAOLEKAR, Y.K.SABHARWAL
ASEEM SHABANLI MERCHANT – Appellant
Versus
BRIJ MEHRA – Respondent


ORDER

1. Leave granted.

2. Complaints, bearing Cases Nos. 118/F of 1997, 120/S of 1997, 121/S of 1997, 119/S of 1997 and 122/S of 1997 dated 19-12-1996, under Section 9 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, were filed by one Ismat Merchant against the respondent. The said complaints were dismissed by the learned Magistrate on 7-9-2002 on an application filed by the respondent for dismissal thereof. It was pointed out to the court by counsel for the accused that the complainant had committed suicide and report to that effect had appeared in the newspaper. In this view, allowing the application of the accused, the complaints were dismissed for non-prosecution. The brother of the original complainant challenged the order dismissing the complaint before the High Court in criminal appeals which have since been dismissed by the impugned order.

3. From the material on record, it appears that both the complainant and his mother committed suicide on 5-3-2001 and his father also committed suicide two days later on 7-3-2001. The present appellant is the brother of the complainant and claims to be the legal heir-legatee of the deceased. It is true, as noticed in the impugned judgment and order


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top