SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(SC) 822

G. P. MATHUR, D. M. DHARMADHIKARI, R. C. LAHOTI
DEVELOPMENT CREDIT BANK LTD. – Appellant
Versus
CCI CHAMBERS COOP. HOUSING SOCIETY LTD. – Respondent


ORDER

1. The respondent has made appearance in the Court.

2. With the consent of the learned counsel for the parties, the appeal is heard finally.

3. This appeal is filed by the opposite party before the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (for short "the Commission") feeling aggrieved by the order dated 1-3-2005 whereby the Commission has directed the complaint to be tried by itself forming the opinion that it was not necessary to drive the complainant to the need of filing a civil suit.

4. The principal grievance of the appellant before us is that it would be deprived of its right to cross-examine the deponents of the affidavits incorporating examination-in-chief tendered in evidence by the complainant in view of the decision dated 3-12-2004 in Original Petition No. 233 of 1996 incorporating a practice direction of the Commission. The direction requires the opposite parties to file interrogatories whereafter the Commission may permit further cross-examination or not, in its discretion.

5. The learned Senior Counsel for the respondent before us i.e. the complainant in the Commission, has submitted that the complainant has no objection to the opposite party conducting a


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top