SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(SC) 549

ASHOK BHAN, A.R.LAKSHMANAN
ARUN KUMAR SHARMA – Appellant
Versus
UT CHANDIGARH – Respondent


ORDER

1. Leave granted.

2. Aggrieved against the framing of the charge, the appellants filed Criminal Misc. No. 41856-M of 2003 in the High Court for quashing of the proceedings initiated against them as well as the charges framed against them.

3. The High Court dismissed the petition of Arun Kumar Sharma,

Appellant 1 herein but admitted the petition of Appellants 2 to 5. The High Court further directed that the proceedings before the trial court may go on.

4. Counsel for the appellants contends that if the proceedings will go on and come to a final conclusion, then the petition in respect of Appellants 2 to 5 admitted by the High Court will become anfractuous.

5. We find some substance in this submission. Accordingly, we allow this appeal, set aside the order of the High Court and remit the case back to the High Court for passing an appropriate order in accordance with law and if possible, dispose of Criminal Misc. No. 41856-M of 2003 at an early date.

6. Appeal is allowed in the above terms.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top