SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(SC) 561

RUMA PAL, C.K.THAKKER
STATE Bank Of India – Appellant
Versus
AKEEL AHMED KHAN – Respondent


ORDER

1. Leave granted.

2. This is a case of compassionate appointment. The High Court has directed reconsideration of the case of the respondent in the light of the three instances, namely, the instances of the Chief Manager Mr P.K. Nath, Mr KJ. Rajgoplan, Assistant Manager and Mr Javed Akhtar, General Manager, Delhi Circle, where the relatives of these persons have been given compassionate appointment. The fact that the compassionate appointments were given in these three cases is not disputed by the appellants. However, they say that there are distinguishing factors between the compassionate appointment given in that case and the appellants case. We are not prepared to carry out the enquiry ourselves but the matter must be considered in-depth by the authority concerned. It is being made clear that whatever principle was followed in granting compassionate appointment in respect of the aforesaid three employees must also be followed as far as the appellant is concerned.

3. The appeal is, accordingly, disposed of but without any order as to costs.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top