SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(SC) 668

B.P.SINGH, ARUN KUMAR
State Of Rajasthan – Appellant
Versus
NALIN SOLANKI, MD, SPENCON (I) (P) LTD. – Respondent


ORDER

1. We have heard counsel for the parties.

2. It is not disputed that Nalin Solanki, Managing Director, the alleged contemnor, has since died. In this view of the matter the contempt petition has become infructuous. The contempt petition is, therefore, dismissed as having become infructuous.

3. Counsel for the State submits that he may be permitted to take appropriate action against the authorities concerned. Without expressing any opinion in the matter, we leave it open to the State to initiate such proceeding as it may deem appropriate.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top