RUMA PAL, C.K.THAKKER
R. K. KAURA – Appellant
Versus
MUNICIPAL COMMISSIONER, MCD – Respondent
ORDER
1. Leave granted.
2. The appellant has challenged an assessment of the rateable value of the appellants residential premises under the Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957. According to the appellant, it was first assessed at Rs 39,260. The appellant protested against the assessment. An order was then passed by the Assistant Assessor and Collector valuing the property at Rs 21,210 for the period 1-4-1989 to 31-3-1994 and from 31-4-1994 till date at Rs 14,100. The appellant has no grievance as far as fixation of the value at Rs 14,100 is concerned for the period subsequent to 1-4-1994. He has also been paying the dues under the Act to the respondent on such basis. He, however, contends that the rate fixed at Rs 21,210 was fixed without giving him any opportunity of being heard.
3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents has stated that the appellant had been heard. He had appeared and made his statements. The documents already produced by the appellant had been considered.
4. The appellant instead of preferring appeal under Section 169 of the Act filed a writ application before the High Court. The learned Single Judge dismissed the writ application. The Divisio
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.