SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(SC) 775

RUMA PAL, C.K.THAKKER
R. K. KAURA – Appellant
Versus
MUNICIPAL COMMISSIONER, MCD – Respondent


ORDER

1. Leave granted.

2. The appellant has challenged an assessment of the rateable value of the appellants residential premises under the Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957. According to the appellant, it was first assessed at Rs 39,260. The appellant protested against the assessment. An order was then passed by the Assistant Assessor and Collector valuing the property at Rs 21,210 for the period 1-4-1989 to 31-3-1994 and from 31-4-1994 till date at Rs 14,100. The appellant has no grievance as far as fixation of the value at Rs 14,100 is concerned for the period subsequent to 1-4-1994. He has also been paying the dues under the Act to the respondent on such basis. He, however, contends that the rate fixed at Rs 21,210 was fixed without giving him any opportunity of being heard.

3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents has stated that the appellant had been heard. He had appeared and made his statements. The documents already produced by the appellant had been considered.

4. The appellant instead of preferring appeal under Section 169 of the Act filed a writ application before the High Court. The learned Single Judge dismissed the writ application. The Divisio




Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top