SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(SC) 682

H.K.SEMA, B.N.AGARWAL
GHAZIABAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY – Appellant
Versus
DAVENDRA SHARMA – Respondent


ORDER

Civil Appeals Nos. 7396, 7695 of 2002, 400, 1018, 3955 of 2003, SLPs (C) Nos. 23127, 14052 of 2003, Civil Appeals Nos. 407, 401, 398 of 2003, 8514, 7783 of 2002 and 408 of 2003

1. Heard the parties.

2. The point involved in these cases is concluded by judgments of this Court rendered in Ghaziabad Development Authority v. Balbir Singh1 and Ghaziabad Development Authority v. Balbir Singh2.

3. Accordingly, these appeals and special leave petitions are disposed of in terms of the said judgments. No costs.

4. It is clarified that no interest shall be payable during the period when stay granted by the High Court was operative.

Civil Appeals Nos. 1012, 1488, 3910 of 2003, 8529 of 2002, 2768, 2769, a 2770,2771,2772 of2005 arising out of SLPs (C) Nos. 12583, 12605, 12606, 12607, 13785 of 2003, Civil Appeals Nos. 8401, 7287 of 2002, 403, 1015, 1965, 3959 0f 2003, 7386 of 2002 and 1020 of 2003

5. Heard the parties.

6. Delay condoned.

7. Leave granted in special \eave petitions.

8. In all these cases, it has been stated that the Ghaziabad Development Authority has not been able to deliver possession to the allottees. It has been held by this Court in the case of Ghaziabad Development Aut


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top