H.K.SEMA, B.N.AGARWAL
GHAZIABAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY – Appellant
Versus
DAVENDRA SHARMA – Respondent
ORDER
Civil Appeals Nos. 7396, 7695 of 2002, 400, 1018, 3955 of 2003, SLPs (C) Nos. 23127, 14052 of 2003, Civil Appeals Nos. 407, 401, 398 of 2003, 8514, 7783 of 2002 and 408 of 2003
1. Heard the parties.
2. The point involved in these cases is concluded by judgments of this Court rendered in Ghaziabad Development Authority v. Balbir Singh1 and Ghaziabad Development Authority v. Balbir Singh2.
3. Accordingly, these appeals and special leave petitions are disposed of in terms of the said judgments. No costs.
4. It is clarified that no interest shall be payable during the period when stay granted by the High Court was operative.
Civil Appeals Nos. 1012, 1488, 3910 of 2003, 8529 of 2002, 2768, 2769, a 2770,2771,2772 of2005 arising out of SLPs (C) Nos. 12583, 12605, 12606, 12607, 13785 of 2003, Civil Appeals Nos. 8401, 7287 of 2002, 403, 1015, 1965, 3959 0f 2003, 7386 of 2002 and 1020 of 2003
5. Heard the parties.
6. Delay condoned.
7. Leave granted in special \eave petitions.
8. In all these cases, it has been stated that the Ghaziabad Development Authority has not been able to deliver possession to the allottees. It has been held by this Court in the case of Ghaziabad Development Aut
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.