SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(SC) 741

S.N.VARIAVA, A.R.LAKSHMANAN
DEPUTY TRANSPORT COMMISSIONER and SECRETARY – Appellant
Versus
M. B. KISHORE – Respondent


ORDER

1. These appeals are filed against the judgment of the Andhra Pradesh High Court dated 22-7-1999.

2. Briefly stated, the facts are as follows:

The Government of Andhra Pradesh issued GOM No. 224 dated 7 -11-1996. This GO is issued in exercise of power under Section 9(1)(a)(i) of the Andhra Pradesh Motor Vehicles Taxation Act, 1963 (for short "the Act"). By this GO concessional rate of duty was granted to certain categories of contract carriages but such concession was granted, inter alia, on the following two conditions:

"(vi) The vehicle shall be engaged by a homogeneous group having a common purpose.

(vii) Violation of any of the conditions specified above will entail on levy of full quarterly tax applicable to State-wide contract carriages."

3. It was found that many persons having taken advantage of the GO had in fact obtained special permits for limited stage carriage. Therefore, a demand was made on them under the aforementioned clause (vii) of the GO. A number of writ petitions came to be filed. All those writ petitions were disposed of by the impugned judgment wherein it has been held that clause (vii) is ultra vires Section 9 of the said Act and that therefore no tax














Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top