SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(SC) 1606

Supreme Court Of India
Y.K. SABHARWAL AND D.M. DHARMADHIKARI, JJ.
GOA FOUNDATION (1) - Petitioner
Versus
UNION OF INDIA- Respondent
Writ Petition (C) No. 460 of 2004, Decided on December 17, 2004
Advocates appeared
Raj Panjwani and Ms Purnima Bhat, Advocates, for the Petitioner;
A. Sharan, Additional Solicitor General (Vikas Sharma and Anil Katiyar, Advocates). for the Respondent.

Headnote:A. Environment - Mining lease - Renewal of - Applicants claim that the general rule that any non-forest activity must not be allowed within a distance of 1 km from the sanctuary/forest area may not be rigidly applied so far as the State of Goa is concerned and in that State the projects should be examined on site-specific basis - Forest Advisory Committee directed to examine the matter - Report be made available to the Court by the next date of hearing - National Board for Wildlife to submit its report to Forest Advisory Committee - Forest Advisory Committee will examine the report of the Standing Committee of the National Board for Wildlife (which is not unanimous) - Will also advert to the question as to how far mining activities undertaken by the applicants in the past might have had any adverse effect on the wildlife and whether or not it has breached the groundwater level in the area and gone below it and its likely consequences on the environment/wildlife.

       [Paras 1 and 3]

       B. Environment - Forest Land – User as non forest purpose - Applicant Company has in its possession 26 acres of land on which its factory is standing – Apart from 26 acres of land on which its factory is standing about 3.185 acres of land bearing Khasra Nos. 1506, 1512 and 1556 in Village Anandpur is forest land - Seeks permission to convert it to non-forest area and subject it to non-forest use - Matter may be considered by MoEF within three months subject to payment of NPV and fulfilment of other conditions as imposed by CEC - IA is disposed of accordingly.

       [Para 5]

       C. Environment - Forests - Applicant seeks permission for construction of Lukung-Phobrang-Chartese Pt. 4433 Road – Proposed road passing through the Changthang Cold Desert Wildlife Sanctuary - Seeks permission for removal of unidentified 1052 trees of spontaneous growth in the forest areas of Nedunganur Forest and M.R. Palayam Forest for the proposed four-laning from 121 km to 325 km from Trichy to Tindivanam of NH 45 - CEC has examined the project the subject, its feasibility and importance - Made certain recommendations - Acceptable to the applicant - Subject to the fulfilment of the conditions/recommendations as laid down by CEC, the project is cleared.

       [Paras 12 and 13]

ORDER

1. We have perused the affidavit filed by Mr G. V. Subrahmanyam, Director, Ministry of Environment and Forests, dated 7-12-2004, along with which list of projects in the industry sector which have been accorded ex post facto environmental clearance up to 14-5-2004 has been annexed. As per the said list, 95 projects in the industry sector have been accorded ex post facto environmental clearance. The notification dated 27-1-1994, inter alia, prohibits construction work, preliminary or otherwise, relating to setting up of the project till environmental clearance is obtained. The nature of the projects to which the said notification applies has been indicated in the notification itself. The last extension granted by the Ministry of Environment and Forests to seek environment impact clearance was in terms of the circular dated 14-5-2002 whereunder the application had to be filed by 31-3-2003. The said circular has been commented upon by this Court in M.C. Mehta v. Union of India1.

2. Our attention has been drawn by Mr Panjwani, learned counsel, to the answer given in Parliament by the Minister of State in the Ministry of Environment and Forests relating to the units operating without prior environmental clearance. The answer states that the Government had received 465 proposals for ex post facto environmental clearance by 31-3-2003 of which 249 are in the industry sector and 216 in the mining sector. Even if 95 projects in the industry sector, referred to above, are reduced from the aforesaid figure of 249, it will still leave many projects in the industry sector going on without clearance besides 216 projects in the mining sector. A copy of the answer given by the Minister on the floor of the House has been handed over by Mr Panjwani to learned Additional Solicitor General. Let learned Additional Solicitor General take instructions and file an affidavit as to the units operating in violation of the notification dated 27-1-1994, steps taken regarding the remaining proposals and the other relevant facts in regard to the compliance with the environmental impact assessment notification in letter and spirit. This shall be done by filing an affidavit within a period of four weeks.

3. The matter is adjourned.

Court Masters

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top